Friday, November 15, 2019

IN THE NAME OF RAM AND ONCE AGAIN AYYAPPAN


And the latest news; a 3:2 verdict, the Supreme Court referred to a seven-judge bench the pleas seeking review of its historic 2018 judgement allowing women and girls of all ages to enter the Sabarimala temple, set to open on November 17



A legal personality is an artificial creation of the law – Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court says a legal person is any entity other than human beings to which the law attributes a personality. Otherwise called a juristic person is a non-human legal entity recognised by the law and entitled to rights and duties in the same way as a human being. Sometimes legal personality even may be conferred on an abstract idea.
Idols have been identified as juristic persons in Hindu law which personifies the deity as a legal person. Legal personality is conferred on Hindu idols to provide courts with a conceptual framework to pass judgment on disputes involving claims over disputed property gifted to or belonging to Hindu idols.
A company is a legal entity. So are the temple deities. Many temple deities like Tirupati Balaji pay tax, own bank account and even a PAN CARD.
Thus a Deity like a normal human being can fight a legal battle through their trustees or Managing Board of a temple in which they are worshipped.
Although let us underline the fact that these Juristic personalities have only legal rights and not constitutional rights.
When Ram lalla was declared as a legal personality the Ramjanmbhoomi, was not declared so for the following reasons:
1. it will strip of the basic characteristic of an immovable property.
2. no evidence for manifestation of GOD at the disputed site
3. present dispute are questions pertaining to the rightful manager of the deity and the access of the devotees of Lord Ram to the idols and not on the underlying immovable property.
So we have another landmark judgment to wait for once again in the name of Ayyappan.

No comments:

Post a Comment